Founder: Turnaround Talk
In February, Finance Minister – Enoch Godongwana – issued a stern warning during the National Budget Presentation, there will be no more bailouts for failing State Owned Enterprises. And Government has stuck to its guns, in March, Public Enterprises Minister – Pravin Gordhan – informed Mango (a subsidiary of beleaguered SAA) that the airline should expect significantly less than what was promised to it by Government.
The issue of debt seems to be a divisive one. It was a serious pain point during the SAA business rescue with Government adamant that it would not foot that bill entirely. Recent news from the ANC Policy Conference, which is currently being held, is that Government will be taking over part of Eskom’s R396 billion debt bill.
It seems that some SOE’s are more equal than others.
Some subheadings and the final section was written by Turnaround Talk.
Finalising a plan
The Bloomberg article points out that Treasury is finalising a plan to take over a portion of Eskom’s R396 billion debt as part of a process to place the struggling electricity company on a sustainable footing, a top official said. The company’s bonds surged.
The “broad brush strokes” of the debt transfer will be announced in the mid-term budget scheduled for October, Duncan Pieterse, Head of Assets and Liability Management at the National Treasury, told Bloomberg. The authorities will seek cabinet and parliament’s approval for the plan after determining the amount, along with the conditions the utility will need to meet before and following such a transaction.
The article adds that Treasury has done financial modeling around the debt transfer and appointed lawyers to advise it on regulatory and legal hurdles, including loan covenants, Pieterse said. It’s also working with Eskom to determine what needs to be done to ensure the state-owned company is sustainable after the debt transfer has taken place.
“There is no point in dealing with the debt, only for the entity to return to the fiscus for further support,” Pieterse told Bloomberg. “Then you are basically executing a debt transfer without making sure that you will have a sustainable entity in the end,” he said, adding that “Eskom has been very constructive in our engagements with them.”
Photo By: Supplied
Bailouts, blackouts
The Bloomberg article points out that setting a plan for Eskom’s debt would mark a key step toward turning around the engine that drives Africa’s most industrialized nation, after years of government bailouts and rolling power outages that have weighed on the economy. The utility has been unbundling into generation, distribution and transmission units in a strategy to update the nearly century-old monopoly, but the government has been stymied by the debt pile that’s required cash injections just to service.
Eskom’s bonds surged the most since May 2020, with yields on unsecured 2028 dollar securities dropping 150 basis points to 11.18% by 15:00. in Johannesburg. Yields on benchmark 10-year government rand bonds fell 19 basis points to 10.9%, and the rand erased a decline of as much as 0.8% to trade little changed against the dollar.
“The government has responsibility for the debt build-up on Eskom’s balance sheet, so it is a good step in the right direction,” Lutz Roehmeyer, Chief Investment Officer at Berlin-based Capitulum Asset Management told Bloomberg. The debt transfer alone would not solve Eskom’s problems without operational reforms, he added.
Godongwana said in his February budget statement that the Treasury would work on a plan to find a fair and equitable debt solution for Eskom by the end of the current financial year. The debt-transfer proposal flows from that announcement, Pieterse said.
“Once the technical work is complete, then this work has to be subjected to budget processes and be incorporated and tested within the fiscal framework, which is ultimately approved by the minister of finance, cabinet and parliament,” Pieterse told Bloomberg. “As announced by the president, we intend to outline the principles of the proposal at the time of the medium-term budget policy statement in October and the execution modalities thereafter.”
Highest yields
The Bloomberg article points out that yields on South African local-currency government bonds are among the highest in emerging-markets, an ascent that accelerated from 2017, when Eskom started to face mounting fiscal and governance issues. Goldman Sachs Group identified the utility as the biggest single threat to the nation’s economy.
In 2019, Eskom received a multibillion dollar bailout, which resulted in the government increasing the amount of debt it sold at weekly auctions, driving up yields. The following year the Public Investment Corp., a manager of government workers’ pensions and unemployment funds, emerged as the potential counter-party of an Eskom debt-for-equity swap. Other solutions have since emerged and faded.
The article adds that among the other proposals to help reduce Eskom’s debt is one resurrected by Godongwana to sell some of its coal-fired power plants. That idea is still under consideration, Pieterse told Bloomberg.
“In terms of the selling of power plants, it is something that we have asked Eskom to look into and it is obviously tricky,” he said. “That is one of the issues under discussion, but it isn’t the main issue. The main issue is how do you create the space for Eskom to maintain the plants they currently have and to invest in the transmission and distribution parts of their business.”
Taking a large portion of Eskom’s debt onto the state’s balance sheet may help lower South Africa’s borrowing costs by removing the uncertainty that’s built into sovereign yields, Pieterse said.
“The question is what happens to our risk premium going forward,” he said. “The feedback we have received has been along the lines of, provided you can get the right conditions in place, provided it is a credible transaction, this can actually be net positive for the sovereign.”
Photo By: Mango
Where does this leave workers?
So where does this leave workers of companies who are in financial distress? Governments actions over the past 2 years have proven that if you work for specific SOEs, then you are among the few that drew the long straws.
There is no doubt that Eskom and Transnet, like SAA before them, are facing financial distress or are on the verge of it. Yet, Eskom and Transnet are to big and to important to fail, so Government will always look for a way to bail them out of their financial trouble.
The plight of workers in business rescue/liquidation situations are always highlighted as they are the ones who suffer for the company’s actions. Like Comair employees who are now facing a future where they may not receive their full salaries, Mango went through long periods where they couldn’t pay their staff. Yet Eskom employees toi toi and hold the country at ransom for a 7% salary increase that Eskom is adamant it does not have budget for.
It seems that if you work for Eskom, financial distress means something entirely different than when you work for SAA.
All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others. – George Orwell.
